Carnoy, Martin, Class Analysis and Investment in Human Resources: Dynamic Model, Review of Radical Political Economics 3 (1971), 56-81. Corcoran, Mary, Christopher Jencks, and Michael Olneck, Effects of Family Background on Earnings, The American Review 66 (May 1976), 430-435. Duncan, Otis Dudley, A Socio-Economic Index for all Occupations, in Albert J. Reiss, Otis Dudley Duncan, P. K. Hatt, and C. C. North (eds.), Occupation and Social Status (New York: Free Press of Glencoe, 1961). Fishlow, Albert, and Human Capital: Some Further Results for Brazil, mimeograph, 1974. Griliches, Zvi, and William M. Mason, Education, Income and Ability, Journal of Political Economy 80 (May/June 1972), S74-S103. Kasnakoglu, Zehra, Distribution in Turkey: Study on the Determinants of Male Earnings Differentials in 1968, Ph.D. thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1975. , A Study on the Determinants of Male Income Differentials in Turkey for 1968, Hacettepe Bulletin of Natural Sciences and Engineering 5 (June 1976), 90-122. Mincer, Jacob, Schooling, Experience and Earnings (New York: Columbia University Press, 1974). Morgenstern, Richard D., Direct and Indirect Effects on Earnings of Schooling and Socio-economic Background, this REVIEW 55 (May 1973), 225-233. Ribich, Thomas L., and James L. Murphy, Economic Returns to Increased Educational Spending, Journal of Human Resources 10 (Winter 1975), 56-77.

AN important question in contemporary 1AILeconomics is whether or not the real wage clears the labor market. Its answer has bearing on issues as diverse as the nature of unemployment, the efficacy of fiscal and monetary policies, and the incidence of income taxes. Unfortunately, consensus as to the correct answer seems to be lacking. While much of modern macroeconomic theory allows for the possibility that the real wage fails to equate the supply and demand of labor (Barro and Grossman, 1971; Korliras, 1975), much analysis is based on the assumption of equilibrium in the labor market (Patinkin, 1965). The purpose of the present paper is to carry out an econometric test for which view of the labor market is more appropriate. Although the model we build is very aggregative and much too crude to be used as a basis for policy, we believe that it provides a first step in making operational the theoretical literature on disequilibrium macro models. Our tentative conclusion is that the hypothesis of a labor market in continuous equilibrium must be rejected. In section II we describe briefly some earlier work on modelling the aggregate supply and demand for labor. It is shown that prior studies either assume equilibrium in the labor market, or deal with disequilibrium inadequately. In section III we specify the disequilibrium model. Section IV contains a discussion of estimation problems, an interpretation of the results, and a comparison with an equilibrium version of the model. A concluding section has a summary and an agenda for future research. II. Antecedents

E. S. Phelps, J. G. Riley; Rawlsian Growth: Dynamic Programming of Capital and Wealth for Intergeneration “Maximin” Justice, The Review of Economic Studies

I. Introduction, 227.—II. The residential land allocation process, 228.—III. The socially efficient RLAP, 230.—IV. The competitive RLAP, 231.—V. Distortion and the property tax, 234.—VI. Conclusion, 240.—Appendix: statement of the necessary conditions for socially efficient RLAP's and proof of the equivalence theorem, 240.

Journal Article Optimal Risk Sharing and the Leasing of Natural Resources, with Application to Oil and Gas Leasing on the OCS Get access Hayne E. Leland Hayne E. Leland University of California, Berkeley Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 92, Issue 3, August 1978, Pages 413–437, https://doi.org/10.2307/1883152 Published: 01 August 1978

E. Han Kim, Elimination of the Double Taxation of Dividends and Corporate Financial Policy: Discussion, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 33, No. 3, Papers and Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth Annual Meeting American Finance Association, New York City December 28-30, 1977 (Jun., 1978), pp. 754-757