To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

Fields:
2 results

Consolidation of New Democracy, Mass Attitudes, and Clientelism

American Economic Review 2009 99(2), 304-309
Adi Brender Allan DrazenDecember 2008When democracy is new it is often fragile or unconsolidated, meaning that importantpolitical groups lack full commitment to the democratic process, so that its survival is notassured. What economic policies can a government use to try to prevent a reversion toautocracy?One answer to this question begins with the argument that the threat to democracycomes from anti-democratic elites Œthe army, groups such as the wealthy who bene–ttedmost under the old regime, the fioligarchsflŒwho are seen as basically anti-democratic andwho have the power to overthrow the new democratic regime. The fimassesflare seen asunambiguously pro-democratic. Under this view, policy to consolidate democracy shouldfocus on placating the anti-democratic elites, or, colloquially but not inaccurately, to fibuythem o⁄.flThis approach has received a superb treatment in Daron Acemoglu and JamesA. Robinson (2005).Targeted economic policy to consolidate democracy can be viewed more generally. Sur-vival of democracy (and policy to enhance that) can be thought of in terms of two fun-damental questions. The –rst is: How does the support of di⁄erent actors a⁄ect theprobability that democracy survives? The second is then: How do these important actorschoose whether or not to support the continuation of democracy or its overthrow? Thedesign of policy to address democratic fragility depends on the answers to these two basicquestions. The policy prescription in the previous paragraph, for example, follows from theanswers: it is the elites alone who are determinate; and, their support depends on givingthem enough that they are content not to overthrow democracy.Our research on the fragility of new democracies focusses on di⁄erent, but complemen-tary issues. While we agree that anti-democratic elites pose a serious threat to fragile1

How Do Budget Deficits and Economic Growth Affect Reelection Prospects? Evidence from a Large Panel of Countries

American Economic Review 2008 98(5), 2203-2220
We test whether good economic conditions and expansionary fiscal policy help incumbents get reelected in a large panel of democracies. We find no evidence that deficits help reelection in any group of countries independent of income level, level of democracy, or government or electoral system. In developed countries and old democracies, deficits in election years or over the term of office reduce reelection probabilities. Higher growth rates over the term raise reelection probabilities only in developing countries and new democracies. Low inflation is rewarded by voters only in developed countries. These effects are both statistically significant and quite substantial quantitatively.