To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

Fields:
33 results ✕ Clear filters

A Development of the Economic Theory of Price Index Numbers

Review of Economic Studies 1935 2(3), 163
Journal Article A Development of the Economic Theory of Price Index Numbers Get access H. Staehle H. Staehle Geneva Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 2, Issue 3, June 1935, Pages 163–188, https://doi.org/10.2307/2967585 Published: 01 June 1935

The Problem of Duopoly Reconsidered

Review of Economic Studies 1935 2(2), 137
Journal Article The Problem of Duopoly Reconsidered Get access R. H. Coase R. H. Coase Liverpool Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 2, Issue 2, February 1935, Pages 137–143, https://doi.org/10.2307/2967560 Published: 01 February 1935

Dynamics of Population in the United States

Quarterly Journal of Economics 1935 50(1), 164
Journal Article Dynamics of Population in the United States Get access F. H. Hankins F. H. Hankins Smith College Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 50, Issue 1, November 1935, Pages 164–173, https://doi.org/10.2307/1882347 Published: 01 November 1935

The Theory of Investment Once More: Mr. Boulding and the Austrians

Quarterly Journal of Economics 1935 50(1), 36
Altho Mr. K. E. Boulding repudiates superficial features of the "Austrian" theory of capital as a matter of a production or investment period, there is danger that his clever mathematical treatment of the single investment in terms of time may lend support to such a position. Examination of the Austrian theory; its main fallacy lies in attributing production of capital goods to "primary" factors, in ignoring organic cooperation of all productive agencies, and in the fact that all are like capital goods in essential respects, 40.— Examination of Mr. Boulding's analogies of population and of lake and stream shows both faulty, 52.— Relations between two views of capital, as continuous or as cyclically produced, consumed and reproduced; necessity of preferring the continuity view, 63.— Basis of production period fallacies is in a confusion of things with values; value production is always instantaneous; it is impossible to treat the production of new capital as the production of its income yield thru future time, which would make the "period" infinite, 64.