To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

Fields:
11 results ✕ Clear filters

III. A Reply

A. P. Lerner
Review of Economic Studies 1936 3(2), 157
Further Notes on Index Numbers: III. A Reply Get access A. P. Lerner A. P. Lerner London Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 3, Issue 2, February 1936, Pages 157–158, https://doi.org/10.2307/2967512 Published: 01 February 1936

III. The Question of Symmetry

A. P. Lerner
Review of Economic Studies 1936 3(2), 150
Journal Article Further Notes on Elasticity of Substitution: III. The Question of Symmetry Get access A. P. Lerner A. P. Lerner Leon Fellow of the University of London London Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 3, Issue 2, February 1936, Pages 150–151, https://doi.org/10.2307/2967508 Published: 01 February 1936

A Note on Socialist Economics

A. P. Lerner
Review of Economic Studies 1936 4(1), 72
Journal Article A Note on Socialist Economics Get access A. P. Lerner A. P. Lerner London School of Economics Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 4, Issue 1, October 1936, Pages 72–76, https://doi.org/10.2307/2967661 Published: 01 October 1936

STOCK EXCHANGE LISTING REQUIREMENTS AND PUBLICITY.

Frank P. Smith
The Accounting Review 1936 11(1), 35-42
Abstract Stock Exchange listing requirements in the United States, prior to 1934, were formulated by individual exchanges, each exchange acting on its own initiative and authority. This had been the practice of American stock exchanges since listings first began to be important in the 1860's. The London Stock Exchange followed the same practice and still decides such questions according to its own rules. In contrast are the Continental exchanges, such as the Paris Bourse and Berlin Bourse, which have had listing requirements, formulated by legislative bodies and imposed upon them for administration. The practice of having varying types of listing requirements on the part of different exchanges has led to abuses both in the enactment and in the administration of such requirements. These variations cannot be considered here but it is sufficient to state that such variations existed to an extent sufficient to justify legislative action. The legislation intended to correct these defects is included in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Two separate measures have been taken exchanges have been classified into two groups, exempted and registered and uniform listing requirements have been prescribed for each group.