In this paper, I examine the effect of corporate greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) on profitability. I use the gender composition of the CEOs' children as an identification strategy to investigate the impact of GHG emissions on profits. CEOs who father a daughter are associated with a 10% reduction in GHG emissions. The reduction in emissions, in turn, improves profitability. A one standard deviation decrease in GHG emissions leads to a 0.14 standard deviations increase in profitability. Examining the channels, I show that CEOs with daughters are more likely to adopt a climate-integrated business strategy and set emission-reduction targets. Emission reduction affects profitability through both information advantage (protection from negative industry shocks, and lower cost of capital), and operational efficiency (lower operating costs and energy consumption) channels.

Executive compensation is increasingly being linked to ESG outcomes. This paper examines whether ESG targets are consistent with shareholder welfare. Using granular information on compensation contracts of Swedish CEOs, we show that ESG and financial targets are competing. ESG-linked compensation is 5 percentage points more common in well-governed firms and 6.3 percentage points more likely for CEOs with broader skill sets (generalist CEOs). ESG scores of well-governed firms improve when generalist CEOs have ESG-linked pay, but there is no effect on profitability. These results suggest that boards set ESG contracts because shareholders derive utility from ESG in addition to wealth, and ESG may not be produced without these incentives. (JEL M14, G14, D21, L21) Authors have furnished an Internet Appendix, which is available on the Oxford University Press Web site next to the link to the final published paper online.