To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

Fields:
3 results ✕ Clear filters

Family-firm risk-taking: Does religion matter?

Journal of Corporate Finance 2015 33, 260-278
We propose that family firms with religious founders have less risk than other family firms. Using a sample of 4159 family firms in China, we find that firms founded by religious entrepreneurs have lower leverage and less investment in fixed and intangible assets compared to firms founded by nonreligious entrepreneurs. These findings are consistent with our proposition. However, these findings primarily hold for entrepreneurs who adhere to Western religions but not to Eastern religions. As such, our paper makes important contributions to the literature on family-firms and their risk-taking and the literature on the relation between religion and risk aversion.

Pyramidal structure, political intervention and firms' tax burden: Evidence from China's local SOEs

Journal of Corporate Finance 2016 36, 15-25
Using a sample of Chinese firms, we examine the influence of state-pyramids on corporate tax burden. We find results that state-pyramidal layers are significantly and negatively associated with effective tax rates, indicating that pyramids formed by the state protect local state-owned enterprises (SOEs) from political intervention. The results hold after controlling for potential endogeneity. We further find evidences suggesting that taxation is one of the channels through which state-controlled pyramids increase firm value. Our study contributes to both corporate finance and corporate tax literatures by documenting the role of pyramidal organizational structures in reducing local SOEs' tax burden.

Does Convergence with International Standards on Auditing Improve Audit Quality?

The Accounting Review 2025 100(2), 189-218
Many countries have converged their domestic auditing standards with International Standards on Auditing (ISA). This study provides global empirical evidence on first-order determinants of audit quality by examining whether and how convergence affects audit quality through utilizing data on 41 jurisdictions and using a staggered difference-in-differences approach. We find that ISA convergence leads to higher audit quality on average. The positive effect is stronger for clients of domestic audit firms, in jurisdictions with stronger enforcement, and when the ISA convergence level is higher. Insights from textual features suggest that changes in principle-orientation, comparability, readability, and size (or length) of auditing standards are positively related to audit quality. Exploratory analyses of textual content using machine learning reveal that the emphases of ISA on going-concern assessment and legal compliance, fraud risk assessment and internal control evaluation, and related-party transactions and subsequent events contribute to enhanced audit quality.