Previous research shows that Democrat- and Republican-leaning investors hold different stock market expectations. In this paper, I identify a novel channel through which political opinions affect investor behavior. Instead of political affiliation, I consider nonpartisan evaluations of the executive from presidential approval rating polls. I find that large net disapproval over the U.S. president’s job is followed by low stock returns, especially in times of high political uncertainty and low market-wide sentiment. Notably, this mechanism explains away Santa-Clara and Valkanov’s (2003) “presidential puzzle.” Overall, the findings suggest that nonpartisan political views have a substantial impact on stock prices.

We study the role of bilateral political relations in explaining variations in the equity portfolio allocation of foreign institutional investors. Using a large sample at the fund–firm–year level, we find that political distance between countries leads to significant retrenchment of foreign institutional investors from local firms. Consistent with our theorized mechanisms, we find that the effect is stronger for stocks that are more exposed to geopolitical risk, dividend-paying, and less liquid, as foreign investors sell off local securities perceived to become riskier to hold. Overall, our findings identify a novel financial channel through which geopolitical risk affects international equity markets.

Firms’ green technology investments are increasingly important for competitive positioning, yet their impact on long-run performance remains unclear. Using electricity capacity data for global utility firms, we construct a unique structural measure of technological greenness based on renewable versus fossil fuel physical infrastructure. We find that adopting sustainable technologies is followed by a long-run improvement in corporate fundamentals that is only partially reflected in stock prices, yielding superior returns over a multi-year horizon. These results partly reflect higher revenue growth in liberalized retail markets rather than investor sentiment, revealing a consumer-based mechanism that likely extends to competitive downstream sectors.

We develop a multi-country model with moral hazard and noise traders and show that investor sentiment should affect employment growth both domestically and abroad. Using a large sample of international industry-level data, we find strong support for the model’s predictions. We show that U.S. investor sentiment has a positive association with labor market conditions around the world, due to spillover effects as well as foreign direct investments from the United States. We also find that U.S. sentiment amplifies the negative effect of local financial crises on job losses, which supports the idea that financial development has a “dark side.”

Political uncertainty represents a key determinant of corporate investment decisions. In this paper, we study the relation between political uncertainty and investment from the perspective of institutional investors. Using U.S. equity holdings data from 13F filings, we find that institutional investors herd during politically uncertain times. This trading behavior is stronger when U.S. presidents are unpopular, due to their proclivity for controversial policies, and among riskier stocks. We also find that this mechanism, despite generating some excess trading, helps incorporate a risk premium into stock prices. Overall, the findings unveil a new channel through which political uncertainty affects financial markets.

Recent research shows that a high wage-gap between managers and workers identifies better-performing firms, but the stock market does not seem to price this information. In this paper, we show that not all investors neglect pay inequality. Using a unique data set on German firms' employee compensation, we find that the mispricing of the wage gap is driven by limits to arbitrage. Specifically, some investors seem to bid up low-wage-gap stocks for non-monetary reasons, thus exhibiting a preference for low pay-inequality. The results suggest that firms with equitable pay schemes are rewarded with a lower cost of capital.

Earlier research finds correlation between sentiment and future economic growth, but disagrees on the channel that explains this result. We shed new light on this issue by exploiting cross-sectional variation in country size and market efficiency. We find that sentiment shocks in the largest advanced economies increase economic activity, but only temporarily and without affecting productivity. Conversely, sentiment shocks in smaller or less advanced economies predict prolonged economic growth and a corresponding increase in productivity. The results support the view that sentiment can create economic booms, although only in economies where sentiment and fundamentals are harder to disentangle.