Knowledge that Transforms

We examine whether negative news media coverage of peer audit firms affects audit quality by mitigating the contagion effect of low-quality audits. We find that when a company issues a restatement, other companies served by the same audit office or within the same city are more likely to subsequently issue a restatement. However, we find that higher negative peer firm news coverage mitigates this contagion effect, particularly when auditors have greater opportunity to improve audit quality (smaller companies) and when media attention amplifies reputational pressures (higher local news intensity). Our findings extend to litigation-related news but not to nonnegative news, suggesting that auditors respond to perceived reputational threats stemming from negative news. Additionally, negative peer news increases auditor attention, consistent with an auditor supply-side effect that improves audit quality. Our findings highlight the media’s role as an informal oversight mechanism.

We examine how analysts’ information acquisition and processing differ when analysts have access to AI resources, focusing on investment banks’ AI investments. We propose and test a two‐step framework, which is informed by in‐depth interviews with analysts. First, consistent with AI facilitating automation‐assisted public information processing, we show that AI investments are associated with more timely earnings forecasts following 10‐K filings, particularly after the implementation of iXBRL, which increases the machine readability of filings. Second, we show that analysts reallocate the time and capacity freed by automation toward acquiring and incorporating private information, supported by several sets of evidence: AI investments (1) are associated with higher quality and bolder earnings forecasts, particularly when private information is more important and accessible to analysts; (2) are associated with an expansion of analyst coverage to new firms and industries; and (3) are associated with higher information‐seeking efforts, particularly greater participation in earnings conference calls. Additionally, exploiting the launch of AskResearchGPT at Morgan Stanley, an in‐house generative AI designed for research, we find results consistent with our main analyses. Overall, our study provides insights into the potential for AI to reshape the human value of sell‐side analysts.

This study examines whether weakening employee non‐disclosure agreements (NDAs) affects the flow of information to capital markets via the business press. After state laws weakened NDAs related to misconduct, treated firms exhibit a significant increase in corporate news relative to control firms. The increase is driven by non‐financial news, particularly about legal issues and corporate social responsibility. Articles become significantly more negative in tone and generate stronger market reactions, indicating that employees increasingly share informative negative information with journalists. Further, we document increased interactions between employees and journalists, with more articles citing employees as sources. Our evidence suggests that employees are an important source of corporate information for journalists and that blanket NDAs can impede this channel. Overall, the study highlights an important trade‐off between protecting firms' confidential information and preserving transparency. Our findings suggest that boards, executives, and regulators should design employment confidentiality policies that protect legitimate proprietary information without suppressing the disclosure of misconduct that is important for market discipline and governance.

Why do so few women become CEOs? To understand this glass ceiling, we estimate a dynamic model of the CEO gender decision, which contains perceived gender productivity differences, search costs reflecting limited female labor supply, and employer disutility from discrimination. The key factor is the shortage of suitable female candidates, as boards prefer hiring women, and productivity differences between genders are minimal. We find no evidence of a glass cliff in which women become CEOs just as firms are failing. While better governance is associated with women becoming CEOs, the importance of limited female labor supply is unrelated to governance.

We examine how labor market competition affects the quality of workplace information on social media. Using employer reviews on Glassdoor for U.S. publicly listed firms from 2011 to 2022, we find that reviews become less informative about actual workplace practices when firms face more intense competition for labor, consistent with competition inducing workplace information management. The decline in review informativeness is more pronounced when employees have narrower external networks, when firms are less unionized, and when firms have a smaller review base, suggesting that workplace information management is more likely when labor market information asymmetry is greater. Additional analyses show that positive reviews in highly competitive labor markets predict higher short-term labor inflows but greater subsequent employee turnover, indicating a gap between managed expectations and actual workplace conditions. Taken together, our evidence suggests that labor market competition potentially distorts the crowdsourced signals available to job seekers on anonymous review websites.

We study how fatal and nonfatal health shocks affect households’ ability to meet their financial obligations. We find that fatal shocks substantially increase the likelihood of default and that housing wealth plays a key role as a self-insurance mechanism. Surviving spouses who experience the largest income losses are more likely to sell their homes, and those without housing wealth face a sharply higher risk of debt collection. In the most financially vulnerable families, these shocks even generate intergenerational spillovers. In contrast, nonfatal health shocks lead to only modest increases in default risk. Taken together, our findings suggest that strengthening survivors’ benefits for households with limited resources could improve welfare across generations.

We find that banking relationships built through institutional cross‐ownership influence the granting of loans as well as loan contract terms. Firms that are newly added to institutional cross‐owners' portfolios are more likely to borrow from banks that previously issued loans to other firms within the same portfolio. These related banks charge lower loan interest spreads and offer greater loan amounts than other banks issuing loans to the same borrower. However, such loans also are more likely to include capital covenants in the presence of high shareholder–debtholder conflicts. Thus, lenders appear to value the benefits of common institutional ownership while still protecting themselves against potential risk shifting. The interest spread effect is stronger for borrowers with high information asymmetry, low accounting quality, more financial distress risk, and dedicated institutional common owners. These results are consistent with either direct information flows or indirect signaling effects and are robust to different fixed effects specifications as well as to an identification strategy that exploits common ownership stemming from financial institution mergers. Overall, our study provides evidence that investor networks play a beneficial role in the production and dissemination of contracting‐relevant information and highlights cross‐ownership as a favorable determinant for contracting efficiency beyond traditional accounting measures.

Whereas prior studies primarily examine how environmental shocks affect manufacturing, distribution, and supply chains, we examine a distinct and understudied channel: the effect of wildfire smoke on human capital operating from firm headquarters. Using satellite‐based smoke plume measures, we show that wildfire smoke exposure in a firm's headquarters county is associated with lower operating income, with effects strengthening as smoke becomes more frequent and severe. Exposure is associated with increased employee health concerns, higher employee turnover, and shorter tenure. The negative association is stronger for firms that rely more heavily on skilled employees, and it is concentrated in higher operating costs. Collectively, these findings are consistent with wildfire smoke impairing workforce stability and productivity. Our study points to the need for enhanced climate‐risk and human‐capital disclosures. It also informs HR managers' planning for absenteeism and employee well‐being, and helps investors, audit committees, and auditors better assess smoke‐related operating risks.