Knowledge that Transforms

This paper examines circuitousness, which reflects related information being spread throughout a narrative as opposed to being grouped together. Circuitousness in the MD&A is higher for underperforming firms facing an imminent recovery, a difficult scenario for managers to describe and reconcile. Such firms’ disclosures are accompanied by heightened information processing activity, such as EDGAR downloads and analyst forecast revisions. Additionally, initial return reactions are faster but incomplete, consistent with recoveries and the ensuing circuitousness increasing processing costs that delay price discovery. Changes in institutional ownership are concentrated among quasi-indexers, who rely on public disclosure but rebalance only gradually. Circuitousness is incrementally and more consistently predictive than other textual characteristics that are related but are typically associated with obfuscation, such as the Fog index and repetition. Overall, circuitousness in financial disclosure signals that a turnaround is imminent and corresponds to more costly information processing.

We study the real effects of environmental activist investing. Using plant-chemical-level data, we find that targeted firms reduce their production-related emissions. Air quality improvements in the vicinity of targeted plants suggest potentially significant externalities for local economies. Reductions come from increased abatement expenditures and on-site source reduction initiatives, which negatively affect the financial performance of targeted firms. We rule out alternative explanations, including declines in production and plant closures, and provide evidence that firms respond to the specific demands of activists. Our findings suggest that environmental activism is an effective tool for long-term shareholders to address climate change risks.

We study the causal impacts of income on a rich array of employment outcomes, leveraging an experiment in which 1,000 low-income individuals were randomized into receiving $1,000 per month unconditionally for three years, with a control group of 2,000 participants receiving $50/month. We gather detailed survey data, administrative records, and data from a mobile phone app. The transfer caused total individual income excluding the transfers to fall by about $1,900/year relative to the control group and a 4.2 percentage point decrease in labor market participation. Participants reduced their work hours as a result of the transfers by 1-2 hours/week and participants’ partners reduced their work hours by a comparable amount. Among other categories of time use, the greatest increase generated by the transfer was in time spent on leisure. Despite asking detailed questions about amenities, we find no impact on quality of employment, and our confidence intervals can rule out even small improvements. Treated participants broadly increase expenditures, led by spending on non-durable goods and services, with smaller increases in spending on durable goods and human capital. We observe no significant effects on degree attainment, though the magnitudes of the estimated effects generally appear larger among younger participants. Measures of subjective well-being are higher among treated participants in the first year of the transfers but then revert to control group levels. Overall, our results suggest a moderate labor supply effect that does not appear offset by other productive activities.

We examine companies’ voluntary adoption of sustainability disclosure standards developed by the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB). Specifically, we study which company characteristics help explain the use of SASB standards and examine whether voluntary use is associated with sustainability-related activities and market outcomes. We find that peer behavior, sustainability-focused institutional ownership, company size, and existing sustainability reporting practices are key determinants associated with SASB adoption. Moreover, SASB adoption appears to be a highly persistent disclosure choice. It is significantly associated with better sustainability performance, such as lower sustainability violations, greenhouse gas emissions, and pollution levels, particularly when the SASB standards identify those issues as financially material for the company's industry. Finally, SASB adoption is associated with more extensive sustainability disclosure and greater price informativeness, consistent with investors getting additional firm-specific information from SASB-based reporting.